Screener
ORBX vs XNAV
Global X Space Tech ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- ORBX costs 0.77% less per year.
- ORBX is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ORBX follows a index tracking strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ORBX | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $31M |
| Since | 2026 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ORBX and XNAV
Explore further