Screener
OSEA vs ROAM
Harbor International Compounders ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- ROAM costs 0.11% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than ROAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OSEA covers global markets; ROAM covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROAM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OSEA | ROAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $497M | $106M |
| Since | 2022 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.2% | +50.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.1% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.20% | 14.76% |
| Max drawdown | -18.14% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OSEA and ROAM
Explore further