Screener
OUSA vs EDOG
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
Key differences
- OUSA costs 0.12% less per year.
- OUSA is significantly larger than EDOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, OUSA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSA | EDOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $751M | $30M |
| Since | 2015 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 4.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | +5.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.87% | 15.85% |
| Max drawdown | -33.12% | -44.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSA and EDOG
Explore further