Screener
OUSA vs SDIV
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs Global X SuperDividend ETF
Key differences
- OUSA costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SDIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSA | SDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $751M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2015 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 8.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.87% | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -33.12% | -56.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSA and SDIV
Explore further