Screener
OUSA vs SPDV
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
Key differences
- SPDV costs 0.19% less per year.
- OUSA is significantly larger than SPDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSA | SPDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $751M | $90M |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 3.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.87% | 12.31% |
| Max drawdown | -33.12% | -43.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSA and SPDV
Explore further