Screener
OUSM vs DFAS
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- DFAS costs 0.22% less per year.
- DFAS is significantly larger than OUSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OUSM follows a index tracking strategy; DFAS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSM | DFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $904M | $14.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.4% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.33% | 16.89% |
| Max drawdown | -39.84% | -26.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSM and DFAS
Explore further