Screener
OUSM vs EFAS
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- OUSM costs 0.07% less per year.
- OUSM is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OUSM covers north america markets; EFAS covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSM | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $904M | $48M |
| Since | 2016 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.4% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.33% | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | -39.84% | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSM and EFAS
Explore further