Screener
EFAS vs OUSA
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares
Key differences
- OUSA costs 0.07% less per year.
- OUSA is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAS covers global markets; OUSA covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAS | OUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $751M |
| Since | 2016 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.62% | 9.87% |
| Max drawdown | -44.39% | -33.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAS and OUSA
Explore further