Screener
OUSM vs SPHQ
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Key differences
- SPHQ costs 0.33% less per year.
- SPHQ is significantly larger than OUSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSM | SPHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $904M | $17.3B |
| Since | 2016 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.4% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +15.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.33% | 12.73% |
| Max drawdown | -39.84% | -31.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSM and SPHQ
Explore further