Screener
OUSM vs XMHQ
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Key differences
- XMHQ costs 0.23% less per year.
- XMHQ is significantly larger than OUSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XMHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSM | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $904M | $5.2B |
| Since | 2016 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.4% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.33% | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -39.84% | -36.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSM and XMHQ
Explore further