Screener
OVLH vs IWM
Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.61% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than OVLH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OVLH is classified as alternative, while IWM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OVLH follows a volatility strategy strategy; IWM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OVLH | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $102M | $76.9B |
| Since | 2021 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.29% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | volatility strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.2% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.34 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.51% | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -20.69% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OVLH and IWM
Explore further