Screener
OVS vs IWM
Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.64% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than OVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OVS is classified as alternative, while IWM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OVS follows a option income strategy; IWM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OVS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.83% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $76.9B |
| Since | 2019 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 5.97% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.45% | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -45.09% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OVS and IWM
Explore further