Screener
PAB vs PHYL
PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF vs PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- PAB costs 0.20% less per year.
- PHYL is significantly larger than PAB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PAB covers global markets; PHYL covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, PHYL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAB | PHYL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $107M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.76% | 7.71% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.6% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.3% | +4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.20 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.88% | 3.30% |
| Max drawdown | -19.27% | -22.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PAB and PHYL
Explore further