Screener
PAVE vs AQWA
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF vs Global X Clean Water ETF
Key differences
- PAVE is significantly larger than AQWA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAVE | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $26M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.2% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.2% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.75% | 14.38% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -29.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PAVE and AQWA
Explore further