Screener
PAVE vs BOTZ
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF vs Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- PAVE costs 0.21% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than BOTZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAVE | BOTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $3.4B |
| Since | 2017 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.2% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.2% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.75% | 24.09% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -55.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PAVE and BOTZ
Explore further