Screener
PAVE vs MLPD
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- PAVE costs 0.13% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PAVE follows a index tracking strategy; MLPD uses option income.
- PAVE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAVE | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $29M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 10.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.91% | 7.34% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -12.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PAVE and MLPD
Explore further