Screener
PAVE vs PFFV
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF vs Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.22% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than PFFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PAVE is classified as equity, while PFFV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAVE | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $302M |
| Since | 2017 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 8.13% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.3% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.8% | +2.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.91% | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -18.95% |
Similar to PAVE and PFFV
Explore further