Screener
PAVE vs GXIG
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF vs Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GXIG costs 0.32% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than GXIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PAVE is classified as equity, while GXIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- PAVE follows a index tracking strategy; GXIG uses active selection.
- PAVE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAVE | GXIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $175M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | — |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.91% | — |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -3.19% |
Similar to PAVE and GXIG
Explore further