Screener
PBD vs IGF
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.36% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $10.7B |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 10.43% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and IGF
Explore further