Screener
PBD vs IOO
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs iShares Global 100 ETF
Key differences
- IOO costs 0.35% less per year.
- IOO is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $8.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.4% | +42.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +25.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +17.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.36% | 13.60% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -31.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and IOO
Explore further