Screener
PBD vs RFG
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RFG costs 0.40% less per year.
- PBD covers global markets; RFG covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, RFG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $329M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.4% | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.36% | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and RFG
Explore further