Screener
PBD vs RFV
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.40% less per year.
- PBD covers global markets; RFV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, RFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $313M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.4% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.36% | 18.26% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and RFV
Explore further