Screener
PBOT vs IBOT
Pictet AI & Automation ETF vs Vaneck Robotics ETF
Key differences
- PBOT costs 0.46% less per year.
- IBOT is significantly larger than PBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBOT follows a active selection strategy; IBOT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBOT | IBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $71M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +58.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 22.06% |
| Max drawdown | -15.78% | -25.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBOT and IBOT
Explore further