Screener
PBOT vs IGPT
Pictet AI & Automation ETF vs Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
Key differences
- PBOT costs 0.55% less per year.
- IGPT is significantly larger than PBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBOT follows a active selection strategy; IGPT uses index tracking.
- IGPT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBOT | IGPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $875M |
| Since | 2025 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +119.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +42.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 28.47% |
| Max drawdown | -15.78% | -50.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBOT and IGPT
Explore further