Screener
PCCE vs PCIG
Polen Capital China Growth ETF vs Polen Capital International Growth ETF
Key differences
- PCIG costs 0.15% less per year.
- PCIG is significantly larger than PCCE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PCCE covers emerging markets markets; PCIG covers global.
- PCCE follows a index tracking strategy; PCIG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCCE | PCIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $27M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.35% | 0.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | -12.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.79% | 18.42% |
| Max drawdown | -26.38% | -23.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCCE and PCIG
Explore further