Screener
PCCE vs EPOL
Polen Capital China Growth ETF vs iShares MSCI Poland ETF
Key differences
- EPOL costs 0.41% less per year.
- EPOL is significantly larger than PCCE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PCCE covers emerging markets markets; EPOL covers europe.
- EPOL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCCE | EPOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $609M |
| Since | 2024 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.35% | 4.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +39.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +37.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.79% | 23.48% |
| Max drawdown | -26.38% | -61.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCCE and EPOL
Explore further