Screener
PCRB vs GIGL
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - vs Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GIGL costs 0.07% less per year.
- GIGL is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PCRB follows a index tracking strategy; GIGL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCRB | GIGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $172M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 9.54% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.80% | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.20% | -3.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCRB and GIGL
Explore further