Screener
PCS vs HYS
PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF vs PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- PCS costs 0.36% less per year.
- HYS is significantly larger than PCS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PCS follows a active selection strategy; HYS uses index tracking.
- HYS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCS | HYS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $520M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 7.32% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.52% |
| Max drawdown | -1.12% | -20.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCS and HYS
Explore further