Screener
PCY vs EMHC
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMHC costs 0.27% less per year.
- PCY is significantly larger than EMHC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PCY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PCY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCY | EMHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $252M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.90% | 6.13% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.2% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.1% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.45% | 5.42% |
| Max drawdown | -38.02% | -28.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCY and EMHC
Explore further