Screener
PEJ vs IWM
Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.38% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than PEJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PEJ | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $76.9B |
| Since | 2005 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.40% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.5% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.60% | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -58.96% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PEJ and IWM
Explore further