Screener
PEJ vs XMLV
Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.32% less per year.
- XMLV is significantly larger than PEJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PEJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PEJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PEJ | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $750M |
| Since | 2005 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.40% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.5% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | +6.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.60% | 10.33% |
| Max drawdown | -58.96% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PEJ and XMLV
Explore further