Screener
PEMX vs PFUT
Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Key differences
- PEMX is significantly larger than PFUT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PEMX covers emerging markets markets; PFUT covers north america.
- PEMX follows a active selection strategy; PFUT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PEMX | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $5M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +62.5% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.02% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -14.91% | -44.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PEMX and PFUT
Explore further