Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PEMX vs PPEM

Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF -

PEMX

Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

Franklin Templeton Investments

Annual cost

0.69%

Fund size

$20M

PPEM

Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF -

Franklin Templeton Investments

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$7M

Key differences

  • PPEM costs 0.09% less per year.
  • PEMX follows a active selection strategy; PPEM uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

PEMXPPEM
Annual cost (TER)0.69%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$20M$7M
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.22%1.93%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+62.5%+53.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+24.3%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.09
Volatility 1Y21.02%20.68%
Max drawdown-14.91%-18.44%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to PEMX and PPEM