Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PEMX vs SPEM

Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

PEMX

Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

Franklin Templeton Investments

Annual cost

0.69%

Fund size

$20M

SPEM

State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.07%

Fund size

$17.3B

Key differences

  • SPEM costs 0.62% less per year.
  • SPEM is significantly larger than PEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • PEMX follows a active selection strategy; SPEM uses index tracking.
  • SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

PEMXSPEM
Annual cost (TER)0.69%0.07%
Fund size (AUM)$20M$17.3B
Since20232007
Dividend yield1.22%2.58%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+62.5%+30.3%
CAGR 3YN/A+19.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.6%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.95
Volatility 1Y21.02%15.88%
Max drawdown-14.91%-36.06%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to PEMX and SPEM