Screener
PEMX vs XCNY
Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.50% less per year.
- PEMX follows a active selection strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PEMX | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $9M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +62.5% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.02% | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -14.91% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PEMX and XCNY
Explore further