Screener
PEPS vs CGGO
Parametric Equity Plus ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- PEPS costs 0.37% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than PEPS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PEPS is classified as alternative, while CGGO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PEPS covers north america markets; CGGO covers global.
- PEPS follows a option income strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PEPS | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.22% | 16.59% |
| Max drawdown | -9.79% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PEPS and CGGO
Explore further