Screener
PEY vs OMFS
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFS costs 0.15% less per year.
- PEY is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PEY follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PEY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PEY | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $275M |
| Since | 2004 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.46% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.2% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.18% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -41.55% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PEY and OMFS
Explore further