Screener
PFFA vs PCLO
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF vs Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF
Key differences
- PCLO costs 1.82% less per year.
- PFFA is significantly larger than PCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFFA follows a active selection strategy; PCLO uses index tracking.
- PFFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFFA | PCLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.11% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $19M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 9.57% | 5.32% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.0% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.07% | 0.90% |
| Max drawdown | -70.52% | -0.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFFA and PCLO
Explore further