Screener
PFFD vs SPFF
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF vs Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFD costs 0.25% less per year.
- PFFD is significantly larger than SPFF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPFF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFFD | SPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $148M |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 6.30% | 6.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.1% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.2% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.21% | 9.51% |
| Max drawdown | -30.93% | -35.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFFD and SPFF
Explore further