Screener
PFIG vs BAB
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.06% less per year.
- BAB is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PFIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFIG | BAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $113M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2011 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 4.05% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.10% | 5.97% |
| Max drawdown | -15.73% | -27.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFIG and BAB
Explore further