Screener
PFIG vs VRP
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.28% less per year.
- VRP is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VRP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFIG | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $113M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2011 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 6.39% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 1.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.10% | 2.87% |
| Max drawdown | -15.73% | -46.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFIG and VRP
Explore further