Screener
PFIG vs VRIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.08% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFIG follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VRIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFIG | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $113M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2011 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 2.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.10% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -15.73% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFIG and VRIG
Explore further