Screener
PFM vs DIVZ
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF vs Polen Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- PFM costs 0.13% less per year.
- PFM is significantly larger than DIVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFM follows a index tracking strategy; DIVZ uses active selection.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFM | DIVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $764M | $242M |
| Since | 2005 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 2.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.4% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.63% | 9.19% |
| Max drawdown | -32.21% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFM and DIVZ
Explore further