Screener
PFXF vs SMH
VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.05% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than PFXF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFXF is classified as fixed income, while SMH is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFXF | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $58.8B |
| Since | 2012 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.2% | +151.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.7% | +65.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | +39.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.86% | 30.57% |
| Max drawdown | -35.49% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFXF and SMH
Explore further