Screener
PGF vs BNDS
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF vs Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
Key differences
- PGF costs 0.33% less per year.
- PGF is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGF is classified as equity, while BNDS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PGF follows a index tracking strategy; BNDS uses multi strategy.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGF | BNDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $719M | $60M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 7.93% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.36% | 3.60% |
| Max drawdown | -28.92% | -6.95% |
Similar to PGF and BNDS
Explore further