Screener
PGF vs GTOC
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF vs Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- GTOC costs 0.29% less per year.
- PGF is significantly larger than GTOC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGF is classified as equity, while GTOC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- PGF follows a index tracking strategy; GTOC uses active selection.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGF | GTOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $719M | $188M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | — |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.36% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.92% | -2.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGF and GTOC
Explore further