Screener
PGRO vs MMLG
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF vs First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF
Key differences
- PGRO costs 0.36% less per year.
- PGRO follows a index tracking strategy; MMLG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGRO | MMLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $107M | $88M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.8% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.19% | 18.13% |
| Max drawdown | -34.73% | -45.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGRO and MMLG
Explore further