Screener
PGRO vs PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF vs Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- PGRO costs 0.06% less per year.
- PVAL is significantly larger than PGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGRO follows a index tracking strategy; PVAL uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGRO | PVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $107M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | +33.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.8% | +24.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.19% | 10.94% |
| Max drawdown | -34.73% | -16.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGRO and PVAL
Explore further