Screener
PGX vs PFFA
Invesco Preferred ETF vs Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
Key differences
- PGX costs 1.61% less per year.
- PGX follows a index tracking strategy; PFFA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PFFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGX | PFFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 2.11% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $2.3B |
| Since | 2008 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 6.16% | 9.57% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +15.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.3% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.14% | 7.07% |
| Max drawdown | -34.10% | -70.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGX and PFFA
Explore further