Screener
PHO vs PRN
Invesco Water Resources ETF vs Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF
Key differences
- PHO is significantly larger than PRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PRN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHO | PRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $401M |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 0.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.6% | +69.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +37.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 28.57% |
| Max drawdown | -34.92% | -36.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PHO and PRN
Explore further